Ambiguity isn’t something that I readily accept. I desire clarity in most areas of my life. I don’t simply want an approximation of my bank balance; I want online updates with line-by-line descriptions. I’m not satisfied with a general diagnosis of an illness; I want scans, percentages, and a strategic plan for recovery. And as an evangelical, I surely don’t want to hear that God’s word is unclear or confusing; I want to fit all Scripture into my neatly designed theology. However, this semester of courses has helped me to remember that God and his Word are not always as understandable as I would like. I’m learning that if I want to think theologically, I need to be willing to accept ambiguity. That statement frightens me. In saying that, I fear that I’ve joined the ranks of liberals and the theologically immature. But if I were to be honest with myself, I know that that’s not the case. Accepting ambiguity is not a sign of liberalism or weakness. Accepting ambiguity is simply necessary.
Such ambiguity was demonstrated during a class discussion of Habakkuk 2:4: “Behold, his soul is puffed up; it is not upright within him, but the righteous shall live by his faith” (ESV). Though this is a verse that I’m fairly familiar with, I was challenged to consider a new perspective during our class. The tension exists in the interpretation of the second half of this verse. Depending on the manner in which the text is translated, there are varying ways in which it can be understood including:
- but the righteous shall live by his faith.
- but the righteous shall live by his faithfulness
- but the righteous shall live by my faith
- but the righteous shall live by my faithfulness
They don’t seem very different, but their dissimilarities are notable. I’ve always understood the text as describing the faith of an individual. A man who lives in righteousness is one who lives by faith in God. There’s nothing wrong in interpreting the verse in this manner; we are taught throughout the Scriptures that faith is essential to righteous living. Yet in class I was confronted with a different viewpoint on this verse. Could it be that the subject of the word faith is actually YHWH? Maybe the verse isn’t pointing to the faith of an individual, but rather the faithfulness of God in the life of an individual. The Septuagint (the Greek version of the Jewish Scriptures) also seems to translate this verse as pointing to YHWH’s faith (or faithfulness) as opposed to an individual’s: “…but the just shall live by my faith” (LXX). So which is it? How do we understand this verse?
I’m actually still unclear.
So where does this leave me? Does this serve as fuel for the unbeliever’s argument? It shouldn’t. Does this mean that God or his Word cannot be trusted? Absolutely not. Is this showing us that our faith is flawed? Not at all. Instead, it is a reminder to me that I must be willing to accept uncertainty in my study of theology. You see, God has sufficiently provided me with everything that I need for faith and living. He has graciously revealed himself to us through Christ Jesus. The Scriptures don’t allow confusion concerning the essential doctrines of our faith (i.e. God is Triune, Jesus is fully God and fully man, salvation is by grace and through faith in Jesus alone, etc). But at the same time, I need to remember that everything will not sort precisely onto a chart. I will not be able to know or explain all things.
But instead of responding in fear to this realization, I need to respond in awe of the incomprehensible God who has graciously revealed himself to us. He is omniscient and I am not. I must be accepting of that.